The results showed that those who were most anxious about injecting the rat were also the most amused by the discovery. Humour often raises audience arousal by violating expectations or norms.
Violating expectations raises arousal through surprise:. A priest in town is accosted by a prostitute. Puzzled, the priest shakes her off. Outside town he meets a nun. However, the raising of arousal must not impinge on the play state mentioned in Rule 1.
This impingement is what happens when humour is racist, sexist or generally crosses the line. Of course, simply knowing these four rules is not enough to be funny - just as reading Plato is not enough to lead a rich and meaningful life.
But understanding humour is one way of getting to the core of what it is to be human. Check out our podcast episode Anthill Humour Me where we put some of these rules into practice. Portsmouth Climate Festival — Portsmouth, Portsmouth. Edition: Available editions United Kingdom. Become an author Sign up as a reader Sign in.
That is, when leaders used humor, their employees were more likely to go above and beyond the call of duty. Why is humor so powerful? In a study to understand what makes things funny, researchers Caleb Warren University of Arizona and Peter McGraw University of Colorado at Boulder found that humor most often occurs when something is perceived as a benign violation.
They conducted studies in which participants were presented with scenarios depicting someone doing something that was benign for example, a pole-vaulter successfully completing a jump , a violation a pole-vaulter failing a jump and getting seriously injured , or both a pole-vaulter failing a jump but not getting seriously injured. Participants who saw the third kind of scenario simultaneously a violation and benign were more likely to laugh than those who saw the scenarios that were either strictly benign or strictly violations.
Things strike us as funny, the researchers concluded, when they make us uncomfortable but do so in a way that is acceptable or not overly threatening. Because telling jokes that violate our psychological safety can be seen as risky, it can make people appear more confident and more competent.
In one of our studies, we found that regardless of whether a joke was considered successful or inappropriate, participants viewed joke tellers as more confident—because they had the courage to attempt a joke at all.
Projecting confidence in this way leads to higher status provided the audience has no information that suggests a lack of competence.
We also found that people who violate expectations and norms in a socially appropriate way are seen as more competent and more intelligent. This finding confirms our feelings about funny conversationalists: We admire and respect their wit, which raises their prestige. But the violating nature of humor is also what makes it risky.
Although tellers of inappropriate jokes are still seen as confident, the low competence signaled by unsuccessful attempts at humor can lead to a loss of status. Finding the balance between a benign violation and an extreme violation can be tricky—even professional comedians routinely face criticism for overstepping—and it takes skill to get it right.
When we converse with others, we need to balance multiple motives simultaneously. We may aim to exchange information clearly and accurately, make a positive impression on one another, navigate conflict, have fun, and so on.
The degree to which each motive is viewed as normative and socially acceptable varies from setting to setting. A certain joke may work dazzlingly well with one group of people but completely flop with another—or even with the same group in a different context.
Inside jokes are extremely common—our data suggests that almost everyone has engaged in or witnessed one. But how does insider talk, especially inside jokes, affect the dynamics within a group?
We asked people to engage in a brainstorming task on instant messenger. Each participant was teamed up with two of our research assistants posing as fellow participants.
Did it matter whether what they missed was funny? Participants were more likely to believe that their partners thought of themselves as superior in the inside-joke condition than in the inside-information condition, and they reported lower group identification and cohesion when the secret exchange involved a joke. Although levity is typically thought of as a behavior that binds people together, it can draw fault lines in a group, making some people feel awkward and excluded.
Inside jokes have their place, of course. They can signal closeness or camaraderie, making people feel pleased to be in the loop. But the research on this kind of humor is clear: When group cohesion is important, tell jokes that everyone can understand. In their study, participants either made or received sarcastic comments or made or received sincere ones. Participants in the sarcasm condition were significantly more likely to solve a creativity task assigned later in the experiment than those in the sincere condition.
In a subsequent study, participants were asked to merely recall a time when they either said or heard something sarcastic or a time they said or heard something sincere. Once again, creativity on the subsequent task was higher in the sarcasm condition. Why does this happen? Sarcasm involves saying one thing and meaning the opposite, so using and interpreting it requires higher-level abstract thinking compared with straightforward statements , which boosts creativity.
The downside is that sarcasm can produce higher levels of perceived conflict, particularly when trust is low between the expresser and the recipient. During his presidential campaign, John F. Kennedy faced accusations that his wealthy father was attempting to buy the election.
Self-deprecating humor can be an effective method of neutralizing negative information about oneself. Research by one of us Brad and Maurice Schweitzer found that individuals are seen as warmer and more competent when they disclose negative information about themselves using humor than when they disclose it in a serious manner.
When they add humor to a disclosure, counterparts view the negative information as less true and less important. There are limits to the benefits of self-deprecating humor, however. Among lower-status people it can backfire if the trait or skill in question is an essential area of competence.
Serves him right. Once perfected on paper, Vine will then test his jokes on an audience until they are at their most potent. Shappi Khorsandi is an Iranian-born British comedian who started out in comedy back in If it dances about in my head bothering me, I get on a stage and say it in front of an audience. Then I write it down, do it again better, write that down. Each time I tell it, it becomes sharper.
Khorsandi goes one step further than most comics and actually uses the live environment to discover her jokes, relying on her comic brain to find the punchline. The process of refinement then begins. It was for setup and punch line. So I think I was really trying to get it down to exactly where the joke itself shifts, like what word becomes the punch line.
I always liked trying to make things have the fewest words possible. It seems more interesting and kind of more elegant to tell these short ideas.
An understanding of the basic mechanisms of a joke seems to be part of many comedians development. As well as this, Martin soon realised the need for jokes to be concise, even when working within a larger narrative. When it comes to his stand-up performances, Martin uses a system that allows him to develop and refine his newer material whilst still getting guaranteed laughs.
He explained his approach to Fast Co Create :. On the far right were the jokes that were brand new—boiled down to a single word or idea. One column over, in the middle of the page, those are jokes that work half the time, and I continue to rewrite them onstage. If I do, then I move it to the far left of the page.
The show is kind of a failure if I just stay on the far left of the page, because I already know those work, rather than moving forward. A success would be if I did everything to the right of the page and it worked, then I suddenly have minutes to add to my act.
Sometimes I just write onstage, though. Although Izzard recognises how difficult joke-writing can be, he finds that being himself makes the process easier.
Most of it is adlibbed at some point. Turned a few heads. His Twitter feed is full of hilarious Tweets and is deserving of its huge following. But, that said, a lot of stuff is written on stage, because you go into this weird zone where the panic of having to get a laugh forces something out of you, from somewhere.
When speaking to comedy. I draw spider diagrams. Number two is death. Death is number two. Does that sound right? When it comes to observational comedy, Jerry Seinfeld has been leading the way for decades.
Rather than ad-libbing on stage, he uses a pen and paper and a longhand method to hone his material. Like many of the best comedians, Seinfeld understands the importance of rhythm in comedy, to the extent that the words must be the right length with the correct number of syllables.
Very rarely do you walk past something in the street and something pops into your head. The more you do it the more weird you become in that sense. You can have an idea in the morning and get a laugh for it in the evening. No one else can tell you what to do, apart from the audience.
0コメント